How to Prevent an Unnecessary Nuclear War with the Sino-Russian Alliance

Including links to my recent interviews on the Stew Peters and Canadian Prepper shows

On Election Day November 8th, I was interviewed by Canadian Prepper who boasts nearly 850,000 subscribers in a wide-ranging interview which lasted nearly two hours. We did not discussthe US mid-term election in which all the major pollsters were predicting that the GOP would take control of both houses of Congress picking up around three Senate seats, two Governorships and over thirty House seats but since had what appears to be about four US Senate races, four gubernatorial races and about twenty-five House races stolen from them by crooked Democrats. Rather, we focused on more pressing threats like Biden’s escalating proxy war against Russia in Ukraine and Communist China’s reported plans to blockade and invade Taiwan sometime next year, the US response to which will likely determine whether the US and Canada are able to survive the next couple of years.

Here is a link to Part 1 of my groundbreaking interview with Canadian Prepper:

Here is a link to Part 2 of the interview:

I was next interviewed on the Stew Peters show on Veteran’s Day by a fellow US Army veteran and expert on geopolitics, Edward Szall. Here is the link to the interview. We discussed a wide-range of topics but the focus of our discussion was what U.S. leaders could do to avert World War Three. I believe that the most important thing we could do would be for the U.S. to suspend military assistance to Ukraine to pressure President Zelensky to drop his refusal to negotiate an end to the war with Russia. As I stated in a previous article in The National Interest, “A Cease Fire Can Ensure Ukrainian Independence”, now is best time to declare a cease fire and sign an armistice agreement in order to lock in Ukrainian battlefield gains which Russia would likely agree to accept as permanent in exchange for the return of the forty percent of Donetsk oblast which remains under Ukrainian control.

The Biden administration’s position of subcontracting US national security policy towards Russia to Ukraine is a huge national security risk for America as underscored by Zelensky’s continued blatant lies that the missile which killed two Polish citizens was a deliberate Russian terror attack when even the Biden administration and other NATO countries have been forced to admit that it was in fact a Ukrainian S-300 air defense missile which failed to intercept its target and fell to the ground killing two Polish farmers in the Polish border town of Przewodów. Of course, the reason Zelensky is lying about it and saying something must be done is because he has been trying to get NATO into a full-scale world war with Russia in the belief that is the only hope Ukraine has of getting all of its territory back from Russia failing to grasp the fact that Russia would escalate to the nuclear level long before that happens. Rather, the US should negotiate a cease-fire and armistice agreement on the best possible terms for Ukraine directly with Russia and then pressure Ukraine to accept it since the very survival of our great country and our NATO allies is at stake if we do not quickly end the war with Russia. If they refused to accept it, then the US could cut off all economic and military assistance without which they would be unable to continue fighting the war.

Once peace with Russia has been achieved, the US should move quickly to normalize diplomatic and trade relations with Russia dropping all sanctions in return for their adherence to the peace agreement. Then, we should move to sign a mutual security agreement with Russia the centerpiece of which should be a CFE II Agreement as I advocate below in which all Russian and western NATO troops and basing infrastructure are withdrawn from Eastern Europe. Ideally, we would consider signing a strategic partnership with Russia as well as my brilliant mentor and longtime Executive Director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, Dr. Peter Pry, who tragically died a few months ago following a year long battle with cancer, courageously advocated along with perhaps some kind of de facto sphere of influence agreement to greatly reduce the risks of future conflict between the three nuclear superpowers. Even if US leaders were unwilling to forge such a grand partnership for peace with the Russian Federation, we could likely neutralize Russia’s military alliance with Communist China with the other peace agreements between Russia and NATO and thereby end the threat of nuclear war with Russia which as President Biden stated last month has never been greater since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 due to our proxy war against Russia in Ukraine.

Such a new US-Russia NATO detente would cause Chinese President Xi Jinping to doubt whether Russia would adhere to the terms of the Sino-Russian alliance agreement and come to China’s aid in the event of a direct shooting war between the US and the PRC, potentially causing China to tread more carefully in its long-planned aggression against Taiwan perhaps even delaying its planned forced reunification with the island nation. This in turn could make the threat of a nuclear war with China and North Korea less likely. Ideally, the Biden administration would implement my proposed “New Grand Strategy to Counter the Rise of Communist China” to prevent the outbreak of war with the PRC as well.

Finally, I was interviewed by Russian news outlet Sputnik News about the deadly Polish missile incident. Here are my responses to their questions:

Poland will convene a meeting of the NATO Council in accordance with Article 4 of the charter of the alliance in the wake of the missile incident. How do you see the outcome of the meeting? 

I think the outcome of such a meeting will be for NATO to take no new actions against Russia given the fact that the U.S. Department of Defense has admitted that it was a Ukrainian S-300 that killed the two Polish civilians in the Polish border town of Przewodów and not one or two stray Russian missiles as Ukraine falsely claimed. Even after he was presented with evidence that it was one of their own missiles, Ukrainian President Zelensky continued to claim that it was a Russian terror attack on Poland in the hopes that he could persuade NATO to escalate its proxy war against Russia. However, he is certain to fail in this effort. Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki stated earlier today that it may not be necessary to invoke an Article 4 meeting of all NATO members given that Polish President Andrzej Duda, speaking at the same press conference, said there were no signs of an intentional attack on Poland and the rocket was probably used by Ukrainian air defense.

Polish President Andrzej Duda noted that Warsaw has no exact information whose missiles fell on the territory of the republic. However, many countries rushed to blame Russia. Why do you think some nations rushed to accusations without fully understanding the situation? What could Russia's response be?  Is this really an attempt to provoke a military clash between NATO and Russia, and if so, who needs it and why?

I think NATO leaders have allowed themselves to be propagandized into assuming the worst when it comes to Russia after President Biden and Zelensky have falsely claimed Russia is guilty of major war crimes and genocide given there is no evidence that Russian forces have systematically targeted Ukrainian civilians at all outside of attacks on Ukrainian critical infrastructure similar to what the U.S. has done in all of its past major wars. However, the evidence indicates that this was an accidental mishap on the part of Ukraine so I believe reason will prevail in this instance.

I do think that there are some high-level political and military factions in Poland, Latvia and Lithuania that are favorably disposed to a direct shooting war with Russia believing they could take advantage of such a war in Ukraine to settle past scores from Russia’s invasion of their countries before and during the Second World War. This was underscored by the support given by Czechia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania and Slovakia for Ukraine’s recent petition to be granted immediate NATO membership would have led to the outbreak of a full-scale war between NATO and Russia had it been approved. Fortunately, there are twenty-one members of NATO that are not foolish enough to start a war with Russia over its invasion of Ukraine and its recent annexation of four Ukrainian regions which does not adversely affect the security of its members.

I do not understand what these nine Eastern European member states would have to gain by fighting a war between NATO and Russia and they would have much to lose as their nations would be the first to be devastated and perhaps even destroyed in the event such a war were to break out. I do think that some Polish leaders may be favorably disposed to fighting such a war in the mistaken belief that it would remain conventional and that NATO could defeat Russia allowing Poland to re-annex its lost territories from Belarus. I believe it would be in NATO’s best interests to do everything possible to avoid such an expansion of the war to include NATO countries.  

The Associated Press reported: "The missile that hit the territory of Poland was fired by Ukrainian forces at an approaching Russian missile." What reaction can we expect from world leaders and media?

I think that Western leaders and western media will blame Russia for this accidental Ukrainian missile attack on Poland. However, outside of NATO and Ukraine, world leaders and media will not hold Russia responsible for this unfortunate and avoidable mishap.

Will the reaction to the incident change now that the US officials reportedly believe that the missile that hit Poland was launched by Ukraine? If so, how?  

President Joe Biden stated on Tuesday that the missile that killed two Polish nationals did not appear to be Russian. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said even though it was a Ukrainian missile that killed two Polish citizens, Russia is ultimately to blame because it was Russia that started the war. However, blaming Russian for the errant Ukrainian S-300 missile may be a stretch given the fact Russia has been offering a negotiated peace settlement to end the war since the day after it invaded Ukraine and its peace terms have been clear to all Western observers who are unbiased against Russia and who have been paying attention.

Why did the Polish air defense fail to prevent the incident? Could this indicate NATO's weakened defense as the alliance continues to funnel money to Kiev? 

NATO air and missile defenses are much more limited than Russian national missile defenses. I believe this incident as well as the various Russian military drones that have penetrated deep into NATO airspace underscore the need for NATO to greatly increase its missile defense capabilities. Of course, the need for such defenses would be greatly lessened if NATO were to recognize Russia’s legitimate security interests in Ukraine and support an immediate cease fire to end the war followed by the de-escalation of tensions with Moscow and the signing of a Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) II Treaty in which all western NATO troops and Russian troops were withdrawn from Eastern Europe including Ukraine and Belarus as I have long advocated.

In your opinion, how will this situation develop further?

I do not see any negative ramifications stemming from this incident given that it was clearly not a deliberate Russian missile attack on Poland but rather a Ukrainian S-300 missile which attempted but likely failed to shoot down a Russian missile and impacted Polish territory that caused the deaths of the two Polish citizens. I do think that this incident underscores the importance of President Biden following my recommendation to withdraw its security guarantees for Eastern European NATO members to prevent the possibility, however remote, that a similar incident might trigger an unnecessary world war between the US and Russia in the future given continuing heightened tensions between our two rival nuclear superpowers. 

I was also quoted in a recent USSA News article about the Polish missile incident entitled, “NATO Disarming Its Forces as Ukraine Tries to Provoke World War Three.”

Upcoming Media Appearances:

I am currently scheduled for interviews with former America First conservative candidate Jason Preston on his We Are the People radio show on November 23rd and with Paul Mills on his Off Grid Desert Farming podcast on November 25th. I will post links to those interviews once they are available. Please feel free to contact me at my email address below for any interview requests so we can schedule a time.

© David T. Pyne 2022

David T. Pyne, Esq. is a former U.S. Army combat arms and Headquarters staff officer, who was in charge of armaments cooperation with the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa and the Americas from 2000-2003, with an M.A. in National Security Studies from Georgetown University. He currently serves as Deputy Director of National Operations for the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and is a contributor to Dr. Peter Pry’s book “Blackout Warfare” as well as the upcoming book “Will America Be Protected?” which is due to be released later this year. He also serves as the Editor of “The Real War” newsletter at dpyne.substack.com and as a contributor to “The National Interest”. He may be reached at emptaskforce.ut@gmail.com.