If the US had remained neutral during World War One, there would have been no punitive Treaty of Versailles and Nazi Germany, the USSR, Communist China and North Korea never would have existed.
a plunder? a good word to cover up world strategy by those outside the limelight or hiding in the darkness... these people plan centuries in advance with their strategies
It was needed to inflate the newly created fiat dollar. Nothing else can inflate that much. Central banks have 1 purpose - to inflate. When inflation stops, the tower collapses. Steady state is not possible.
Empires are not possible without continual inflation.
“The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.”
—Vladimir Lenin
“5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.”
—Karl Marx, From the 10 planks of communism, the Communist Manifesto
the proverbial meme is 'war is the jews' harvest'.... whether true or not? it fits as Henry Ford would say as he did of the learned Elders of Israel document
This analysis is congruent with what might be called mainstream academic explanations for the cause of these kinds of wars, in that it fails to account for political actors above the level of the nation state. So in essence it reinforces what is essentially a cover story that masks the activities of the other actors (the Bank).
The main purpose the Bank had in involving the US in the war was to crank up the National Debt; a situation made possible by the amendment passed in 1913, giving the Bank the right to create the government's money (as an interest-bearing debt, of course). The thing a government spends the most on is a war, especially a major war, and under this scheme of money creation the more a government spends, the faster the debt grows, and the more the Bank is empowered. If you're the Bank, that's what you want.
The main purpose of the war, in general terms, was likely to create Israel in Palestine. If that was the goal it didn't work, although at the end of the war the Ottoman Empire was greatly weakened and the British, of all people, controlled Palestine. The Bank controls Britain, and has for quite some time, and it was therefore easier to finally establish Israel from that starting point. We had to have another war first, though, to make doubly sure that happened.
- I think we can say the same, NOT only for WW I but also for WW II.
- I am willing to speculate that if the US would have stayed out of WW II that then WW II would have gone "in a different direction". Then perhaps Britain would have been forced to accept the german peace proposals of early 1940/1941 and then the only war(s) of WW II would have been fought between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This also would have extended the life of the British Empiire for a few decades more.
- A LOT OF european countries (e.g. Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, france, England, Italy, ,,... ) were still in an "imperial mindset", thought that they were still powerfull Empires.. That mindset only was thourougly shattered / had completely disappeared after WW I and WW II.
- Agree. If the US hadn't entered WW I in Europe then the european powers would have been exhausted (more) and would have sought earlier a solution which would have brought a more lasting peace in Europe.
- Lloyd George wasn't the only one who thought a resumption oif the war was inevitable war in 1919. French general Ferdinand Foch was someone who predicted that the Treaty of Versailles was "A cease fire for 20 years". Foch was even MORE hawkish than Lloyd George and Clemanceau.
Think you’re wrong. Antony Sutton revealed that the West financed the development of the Soviet Union and that the Cold War was fake. To say none of that would have happened but for the U.S. participation in WWI seems awfully naive.
- Iran recently conducted a nuclear test ??? Why wasn't this more broadly reported (e.g. on the internet) ? This news would have been great for all the people who advocate (more) military action against Iran.
- Return of the industrial base back to the US ? Dream on man ....................... Never heard / read of Emannuel Todd's book called "The defeat of the West" ? Do some searching on the internet to find the english version / discussion of the book. It never appeared / will never appear in english.
Victorious Germany planned to dominate the Continent through annexations and intimidation. No power could stop them since it would rule from Russia to Normandy. The German Fleet would be based in French ports on the Atlantic. Britain would be threatened and, ultimately so would the US. Germany was planning for a world war with the US. Germany under the Kaiser would be just as dangerous as Germany under Hitler.
An even bigger blunder than Americas was Britain siding with France - without this France would have folded and there would have been no World War 1.
And the thanks Britain gets for aiding French in WW1 and WW2 is?
France is the leading country pushing to punish Britain for leaving the EU (Brexit)
France is also the country that takes money from Britain to control the passage of illegal migration across the English Channel but what the cheese eating surrender monkeys actually do is not only allow these "Illegals" to enter and pass through France, but they also aid said Illegal migrants, provide dinghies and a Naval escort out to half way in the English Channel.
France is engaging in an act of war.
We shouldn't have bothered aiding France in WW2 or WW1 then we wouldn't have this"Illegal migration" problem which runs at 600-700 a day, all Muslim fighting age men.
Refugees my aunt fanny. They're well groomed, fit, and clearly here for more than just poncing off the UK taxpayer.
a plunder? a good word to cover up world strategy by those outside the limelight or hiding in the darkness... these people plan centuries in advance with their strategies
But War makes Money
It was needed to inflate the newly created fiat dollar. Nothing else can inflate that much. Central banks have 1 purpose - to inflate. When inflation stops, the tower collapses. Steady state is not possible.
Empires are not possible without continual inflation.
“The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.”
—Vladimir Lenin
“5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.”
—Karl Marx, From the 10 planks of communism, the Communist Manifesto
the proverbial meme is 'war is the jews' harvest'.... whether true or not? it fits as Henry Ford would say as he did of the learned Elders of Israel document
Indeed
Or it could be something even more sinister if Albert Pike's letter is to be believed.
For that means WW3 is incoming.
Probably, they are all Lucifarian Freemasons WW1 and WW2 Wars were planned in advance by these Bloodlines
This analysis is congruent with what might be called mainstream academic explanations for the cause of these kinds of wars, in that it fails to account for political actors above the level of the nation state. So in essence it reinforces what is essentially a cover story that masks the activities of the other actors (the Bank).
The main purpose the Bank had in involving the US in the war was to crank up the National Debt; a situation made possible by the amendment passed in 1913, giving the Bank the right to create the government's money (as an interest-bearing debt, of course). The thing a government spends the most on is a war, especially a major war, and under this scheme of money creation the more a government spends, the faster the debt grows, and the more the Bank is empowered. If you're the Bank, that's what you want.
The main purpose of the war, in general terms, was likely to create Israel in Palestine. If that was the goal it didn't work, although at the end of the war the Ottoman Empire was greatly weakened and the British, of all people, controlled Palestine. The Bank controls Britain, and has for quite some time, and it was therefore easier to finally establish Israel from that starting point. We had to have another war first, though, to make doubly sure that happened.
Always goes back to Babylonian Bloodlines
The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley
- I think we can say the same, NOT only for WW I but also for WW II.
- I am willing to speculate that if the US would have stayed out of WW II that then WW II would have gone "in a different direction". Then perhaps Britain would have been forced to accept the german peace proposals of early 1940/1941 and then the only war(s) of WW II would have been fought between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This also would have extended the life of the British Empiire for a few decades more.
It was no blunder
- A LOT OF european countries (e.g. Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, france, England, Italy, ,,... ) were still in an "imperial mindset", thought that they were still powerfull Empires.. That mindset only was thourougly shattered / had completely disappeared after WW I and WW II.
- Agree. If the US hadn't entered WW I in Europe then the european powers would have been exhausted (more) and would have sought earlier a solution which would have brought a more lasting peace in Europe.
- Lloyd George wasn't the only one who thought a resumption oif the war was inevitable war in 1919. French general Ferdinand Foch was someone who predicted that the Treaty of Versailles was "A cease fire for 20 years". Foch was even MORE hawkish than Lloyd George and Clemanceau.
Well-written, super-informative, fascinating. Thank you, David.
Think you’re wrong. Antony Sutton revealed that the West financed the development of the Soviet Union and that the Cold War was fake. To say none of that would have happened but for the U.S. participation in WWI seems awfully naive.
- Iran recently conducted a nuclear test ??? Why wasn't this more broadly reported (e.g. on the internet) ? This news would have been great for all the people who advocate (more) military action against Iran.
- Return of the industrial base back to the US ? Dream on man ....................... Never heard / read of Emannuel Todd's book called "The defeat of the West" ? Do some searching on the internet to find the english version / discussion of the book. It never appeared / will never appear in english.
I didn't know Hitler hated Arabs
Victorious Germany planned to dominate the Continent through annexations and intimidation. No power could stop them since it would rule from Russia to Normandy. The German Fleet would be based in French ports on the Atlantic. Britain would be threatened and, ultimately so would the US. Germany was planning for a world war with the US. Germany under the Kaiser would be just as dangerous as Germany under Hitler.
I’d relish reading a Turtledove style alt-history book (or trilogy) based on this precis
Excellent if not plaintive analysis, Mr. Pyne. Wilson did a staggering amount of permanent damage to our nation.
IMO best war movie ever: “Paths of Glory.”
An even bigger blunder than Americas was Britain siding with France - without this France would have folded and there would have been no World War 1.
And the thanks Britain gets for aiding French in WW1 and WW2 is?
France is the leading country pushing to punish Britain for leaving the EU (Brexit)
France is also the country that takes money from Britain to control the passage of illegal migration across the English Channel but what the cheese eating surrender monkeys actually do is not only allow these "Illegals" to enter and pass through France, but they also aid said Illegal migrants, provide dinghies and a Naval escort out to half way in the English Channel.
France is engaging in an act of war.
We shouldn't have bothered aiding France in WW2 or WW1 then we wouldn't have this"Illegal migration" problem which runs at 600-700 a day, all Muslim fighting age men.
Refugees my aunt fanny. They're well groomed, fit, and clearly here for more than just poncing off the UK taxpayer.